QUASAR-CREATE · Thrust 2Quantum Security Assurance

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) offers strong security under well-defined physical and protocol assumptions. Real deployments, however, depend on components, interfaces, implementation choices and operational conditions that may deviate from these assumptions. Thrust 2 develops the methods, tools and assurance workflows needed to evaluate whether QKD and QKDN systems deliver their intended security properties in practice.

Testing and evaluation methods for QKD and quantum-safe communication systems.

Quantum Security Testing and Evaluation

Why QKD Assurance Matters

The promise is strong. The implementation must be provable secure.

Quantum Key Distribution is designed to establish shared secret keys with information-theoretic security rooted in quantum physics. But deployed QKD systems depend on real devices, hardware and software components, classical interfaces, protocol variants, network integration, and operational procedures. Thrust 2 focuses on turning security claims into measurable assurance.

Fraunhofer HHI QKD System
The information-theoretic promise

QKD enables two parties to establish a shared secret key. Under well-defined assumptions on the physical implementation of the protocol, security can be proven without relying on computational hardness assumptions.

The implementation reality

Real systems may include uncharacterised components, optical and electronic side channels, fault-injection exposure, protocol adaptations and operational behaviours that are not fully captured by the security proof.

Assurance Gap

The question is not whether QKD can be secure. The question is how to evaluate whether a specific deployed system delivers the intended security properties.

What Thrust 2 Builds

The Missing Layer Between Security Proof and Security Certification

Professional evaluation of QKD systems requires more than isolated experiments or abstract proofs. It requires a structured way to connect mathematical security models, component characterization, attack testing, countermeasure validation, and certification-oriented evaluation criteria.

Thrust 2 develops this missing assurance layer.

From

Theoretical Security Proofs

Thrust 2 Assurance Framework

  • Meta-language and numerical platform for practical security proofs
  • Hardware characterization
  • Vulnerability assessment
  • Security Evaluation Tool
  • Pass/fail criteria
  • Evaluation workflows
  • Standards alignment

To

Real QKD Systems & Networks

Research Areas

Six interconnected research and translational areas driving evidence-based quantum security assurance work.

Practical Security Proofs

Proof frameworks and numerical tools that can incorporate real-world implementation constraints, components characterization data, security measures, and interface with practical evaluation activities.

Key Outputs

  • Proof-to-implementation gap analysis
  • Meta-language for practical security arguments
  • Numerical tools for practical, finite-size key rate calculations

System Simulation & Attack Modeling

Developing models and tools to simulate practical QKD links, emulate attacks, and assist the design of evaluation activities.

Key Outputs

  • QKD system modeling at component & protocol level
  • Attack models and simulation tools for quantum and classical side-channel and implementation attacks
  • Simulation and iteration of evaluation activities

Security Evaluation Methodologies and Tools

Development of bespoke testing equipment, measurement protocols and analysis workflows.

Key Outputs

  • Development of testing equipment and application to QKD reference systems
  • Characterization of components
  • Investigation of hardware behaviour under adversarial manipulation

Quantum Hacking & Vulnerability Research

Investigation of practical attacks and security countermeasures.

Key Outputs

  • Attack vector taxonomy & vulnerability mapping
  • Experimental demonstrations of vulnerabilities and mitigations
  • Countermeasure development and validation

Classical + Quantum Security Integration

Integration of classical security evaluation methods with quantum-specific attack and assurance models.

Key Outputs

  • Combined classical-quantum evaluation workflows
  • Side-channel analysis across quantum and classical layers
  • Investigation of hardware trojans and key delivery pipeline

Standardization & Pre-Certification

Development of reusable evaluation criteria, test templates, and certification-oriented outputs that bridge research and deployment.

Key Outputs

  • Expansion of ISO/IEC 23837 evaluation activities
  • Contribution to background documents for in Common Criteria-aligned QKD security evaluation
  • Assurance level framework for QKD security

How Partners Can Engage

We build bridges between research and practice - through industry-focused collaboration, evaluation support, and open research partnerships.

For QKD Vendors

  • Pre-evaluation of QKD systems, components and security proofs
  • QKD system and component characterization
  • Vulnerability assessment and standards mapping
  • Countermeasure validation

For Operators & Agencies

  • Security architecture review
  • Deployment risk analysis
  • QKD network assurance and monitoring concepts
  • Evaluation planning

For Test Laboratories & Evaluation Bodies

  • Test method development
  • Modular evaluation toolchains
  • Evaluation workflow design
  • Certification-oriented evidence mapping

For Researchers

  • Joint research on practical security proofs
  • Quantum hacking experiments
  • Component characterization and modelling
  • Shared testbeds and publications

Research Team

Principal investigators and researchers from the QUASAR-CREATE consortium driving quantum communication security evaluation.

Harald Kuhn photo

Harald Kuhn

Professor, Programme Lead-PI

Fraunhofer ENAS, TU Chemnitz

Michael Kasper photo

Michael Kasper

Assoc. Professor , Principal Investigator, Director Fraunhofer Singapore

Fraunhofer Singapore, NTU

Christian Kurtsiefer photo

Christian Kurtsiefer

Professor, Principal Investigator

National University Singapore (NUS)

Marco Tomamichl photo

Marco Tomamichl

Professor, Principal Investigator

National University Singapore (NUS)

Alexander Weiss photo

Alexander Weiss

Professor, Principal Investigator

Fraunhofer ENAS, TU Chemnitz

Elias X Huber photo

Elias X Huber

Coordinator, Thrust 2

Fraunhofer Singapore, NTU

Wastu Wisesa photo

Wastu Wisesa

Research Fellow, Thrust 2

Fraunhofer Singapore, NTU

Ayesha Reezwana photo

Ayesha Reezwana

Research Fellow, Thrust 2

Fraunhofer Singapore, NTU

Ian George photo

Ian George

Research Fellow, Thrust 2

Centre for Quantum Technologies (CQT), NUS

Becca Verghese photo

Becca Verghese

Research Assistant, Thrust 2

Centre for Quantum Technologies (CQT), NUS

Leó Weissbart photo

Leó Weissbart

Research Fellow

Nanyang Technological University (NTU)

Seth Hou Shun Poh photo

Seth Hou Shun Poh

Senior Research Fellow, Thrust 2

Centre for Quantum Technologies (CQT), NUS

Bibhuti Thapa photo

Bibhuti Thapa

Intern, PhD-Student

Centre for Quantum Technologies (CQT), NUS

Ethan Shak photo

Ethan Shak

Intern, Data Engineering

Fraunhofer Singapore, NTU

Chun Long Tan photo

Chun Long Tan

Student

Fraunhofer Singapore, NTU

Work With Us on Quantum Security Evaluation

Thrust 2 collaborates with researchers, vendors, operators, test laboratories, and public-sector stakeholders to advance practical QKD security evaluation, certification readiness, and secure deployment of quantum communication systems.

Consulting
Support

Security evaluation, certification advisory, and training services.

Join the
Team

Explore job opportunities and PhD positions in our group.

Research Collaboration

Joint projects, and publication collaboration.

Training
& Workshops

Request training programmes and workshops on QKD and PQC security.